Technology permeates all aspects of our lives, including our most human moments such as romance, sex, and parenting. The lines between tech and humanity are blurring—chatbots look and sound more human, while real-life humans look and sound more perfect. We are fast approaching a point in human evolution where, for the first time, literally every generation will experience intimacy differently than the one before. As our world transforms, does our humanity become more of an asset—something we appreciate and cultivate in contrast to advancing tech—or a liability, which is something we minimize considering technology’s superior perfectionism?
Source: Fizkes/Shutterstock
The answer isn’t obvious, and I’m not suggesting there is a “right” one. For example, I’m not sure any of us really enjoy our imperfections—or those of the people around us. However, it is a question that deserves a thoughtful response, rather than the indifference most of us are offering right now.
Holding humanity up to a bar of technical perfection means tech will ultimately win the competition with humanity. Some would say that we are not competing with tech, but I disagree. Considering the numbers of people already concerned that AI will consume their job, or entice their lover, I’m pretty sure it’s already “game on.”
I watch with utter amazement at the changes I already see in sex and intimate relationships since technology arrived on the scene. Equally mind-blowing is that it’s unclear how people will feel about these advancements in even a decade or two, and how we seem to be ignoring or at least minimizing this inevitable and mysterious transition. Perhaps folks feel helpless to impact this transformation, overwhelmed by it, or they assume that since it’s characterized as advancement, it will ultimately be good. From an ethical perspective though, younger generations are depending on us to think this through. Consider these scenarios—as bizarre as they may seem, they are not far-fetched in the coming decades:
Believe it or not, these scenarios are realistic and even inevitable within the next few decades. I watch with great curiosity the changes already evident in intimacy—we’ve evolved from sex with a human to sex with tech, from traditional courtship to digital connections mediated by algorithms, and from pregnancy instigated by sex to pregnancy via advanced technology. Already, our technological evolution has fundamentally transformed how we meet potential partners, form relationships, and express intimacy—both enhancing and complicating our human interactions. This begs the question: Are we idealizing, or at least favoring, the stuff that AI is poised to provide us? Are we developing a preference for the efficiency and perfection of technology over the authenticity of humanity? If so, what will it feel like to future humans when AI beats them at the one thing that differentiates them from technology—their humanity?
Clearly AI is solving many of our problems. And that’s a good thing. But we cannot ignore its dark side. The future of intimacy probably depends on our realistic appraisal of the pros and cons of advancing technology. What are our goals for the future of intimacy?